Bev Cochran,
administrator of United Methodist Children's Home of the North
Georgia Conference has
been a member of GAHSC for over 30 years. He is truly a prophet and
visionary for child welfare in the State. The following article written for
his publication is pertinent for all providers of child welfare
services:
Signposts.Summer
2011.Volume 43.Number III
From the Administrator's Desk - "Predicting the future of our
agency"
I am playing the role of a prophet who is merely
trying to look into the future and suggest what is likely to happen.
If my wife, Jane, were still living she would tell me if I was going
to be a prophet I will need a crystal ball, and of course she would
add that crystal balls are notoriously unreliable.
Playing a prophet in this present time and at least in the near
future is an uncomfortable place to be. At any rate, I will share
with you some prophecies about what is likely to happen to agencies
of the private sector including church programs.
1. The need for services will increase in our society. This
may seem to be a rather strange
prophesy, considering the fact that the number of children referred
by the state for group care
has been steadily declining. The former director of DHR had said
that there will not be a
long-term future for group care. This had come to the point that
many agencies had closed
during the past several years.
But certain other things are happening which suggest that the
private and Church sector will
make moves to provide family preservation services in an effort to
keep families together and
to help strengthen them.
Another service that is dwindling in the private sector is foster
family care. Our agencies are
receiving fewer children in our foster families because the state of
Georgia has decided to
become the primary player by placing great numbers of children in
their own foster homes.
It’s too early to tell how this will play out in the future. In the
mean time we are recruiting
foster families to take large sibling groups, teenagers, and
medically fragile children as this is
apparently where some help is needed. In all probability, we will
continue our emphasis on
foster family care as it is likely that many new children who need
this service will enter
the system.
2. There will be greater emphasis on working with families.
We began providing family
preservation services in 1977, with parent teaching classes,
financial aid and some family
counseling. We have also provided short-term housing to families for
many years. The need
for these and other services will continue to increase because
mental illness and drug
addiction is on the rise, physical and emotional abuse is all over
the place and because of the
very rat race of our society and the gradual abandonment of settled,
simple, agreed-upon
values causes family life to progressively break down.
Therefore, I predict that our Church agency is headed down the road
to expanding its family
preservation services. Further, as this movement is already
underway, we are transforming
some of our buildings into apartments to service the family housing
program. This program
houses an entire family in one of our facilities and works with them
every day. This helps
them to change quicker and leave sooner and become stronger
families.
3. Our type of agencies will become more professional, in a good
sense of this word. I do not
mean cold or objective, lacking in natural warmth, any more than I
mean given to long words,
for that is a phony professionalism. But I do mean training staff
for their jobs, having some
solid knowledge to act on and having acquired somewhere some
self-discipline in it. For us
this movement is underway.
4. On one hand there will be greater appreciation between some of
the private sector and
government agencies to meet the needs of all children and their
families. While on the other
hand many private agencies may see themselves going their own way
within their budget
constraints and providing smaller service programs their own way
without state interference
and/or perceived harassment, other than the necessary licensing
regulations for some of their
services. It is too early to predict which path our agency may take.
Note – On one hand, there is no reason for the Church and private
sector and the state to see
themselves sometimes as showing little respect for the other, or on
the other hand talking
about being in partnership when only one (the state) has the power.
Heaven knows, we are in
a field where there is much more to do than either can possibly
manage alone.
5. Summary: 1871 – 2010, from Orphanage
→Children’s
Home
→Family
Service
Agency. Having served since 1871, the thing we know is that we are
certainly not a fly-by-
night helping agency. This is to say that I may not know what
services we will be providing
75 years out to families who hurt, but we know we will be relevant
by providing services that
people will need at the appropriate times.
Thank you for all you do to help us to help others and we look
forward to future opportunities that our Lord presents to all of us.
God Bless!
Beverly O. Cochran, Jr.
Administrator